Tags

3 comments
pub_logo_ecn.gif
ECN's Green Technology Brainstorm
by Joe Polastre   |
Mar 11 2009

ECN asked technology leaders to brainstorm solutions that would make the most impact, specifically which green technology has the most commercial promise. I responded, along with 7 others, and our thoughts were published in the March issue. I've included my response below, and you can view the ECN March issue for the full set of responses.

New energy is really expensive. The most commercially viable option is to reduce your own energy use, which, as stated by the Obama Administration, is the cleanest fastest easiest, cheapest way to generate renewable energy. In order to reduce your energy consumption, you need to know precisely where and when you're using it.

For example, most people don't realize that when they do a Google search they are consuming energy—both directly by using the computer and indirectly because Google’s data center is processing the search—and there's a carbon footprint associated with that search. A recent report indicated that just two Google searches are equivalent to boiling water for a cup of tea.

The most commercial potential exists for energy saving rather than energy generating technology, to reduce consumption and cost. One of the technologies that will have the most impact is the “Internet of Things.” With smart, interconnected equipment, things tell you precisely and in real time how much energy they're consuming and allow you to control that equipment from anywhere in the world. An example of the energy implications of the “Internet of Things” is lowering your thermostat or turning off your computer at your home, coordinated from your hotel room halfway around the world.

By making "dumb" objects smart, fine granularity energy consumption information gives you the opportunity to take steps and reduce it—fundamentally based on the principal that you can't manage what you can't measure. Back to our data center example, data centers are expected to consume 4 percent of the total country's energy by 2011 according to the US Department of Energy. If we can shrink that to a much smaller percentage there will be less of an energy burden on our country, and our wallets.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.sentilla.com/trackback/455

Comments

Great blog Joe.

If you could add environmental monitoring to your product, that would be great. Being able to not only monitor power consumption per server, having temp, humidity,etc.. down to the server level as well could be a very powerful tool in reducing under-over cooling. -Tom Nats Managing Partner Red Rocks Data Center http://redrocksdatacenter.com/green March 12, 2009 5:56 AM

Good point Tom.

We do have a customer using temperature/humidity sensors in conjunction with the energy sensors that are part of the Sentilla Energy Manager. If you had temperature/humidity at every server, or a high density of environmental sensors in a rack, what would be the impact on your cooling strategy? By combining energy and environmental data, you could predict when more or less cooling is required.

We spend lots of time going

We spend lots of time going around with the temp laser finding hotspots and adding blanking panels or even moving servers around. Having a small, (RFID type) device that we could put in numerous places would be invaluable. Right now, each sensor costs 150+ so we use them sparingly. A customer of mine has created a lab in where he adjusts the clock speed of his servers based on the cost of energy throughout the day. Very very interesting..

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use <swf file="song.mp3"> to display Flash files inline

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.